brule's blog
<< back to profile

e*thirteen Introduces the SS+

Posted: Oct 29, 2009

Source: e13

In a tireless effort to perfect chain retention systems across the board e*thirteen components has once again raised the standard by which all other chainguides are judged. As the industry leader in chain retention, e*thirteen realizes the importance of making advanced technologies more accessible to budget conscious riders and racers. We believe that a recessed world economy should not be a barrier to enjoying the sports of downhill riding and racing (or even freechucking), and we're proving it!

Details inside,

e*thirteen’s new SS+ guide is the second generation of the already popular SS backplate design. Following in the footprints of its big brother, the SS+ leverages the strength and reliability that helped the SRS+ win the 2009 UCI DH World Cup overall into a cost effective package that beginning riders will appreciate.


This groundbreaking design was shaped by hundreds of hours of engineering and analysis. Once again, e*thirteen has pushed the limits of new technologies, and through advancing stamped steel manufacturing produced the most technologically advanced price point chain retention system ever conceived.

After having been tested on our own bikes and the World Cup circuit for over a year the SS+ has proven to be just as strong and reliable as the SRS+ retention system, and at a meager 258 grams the SS+ is by far the lightest full-bashguard retention system at its price point. The SS+’s weight is less than almost all of our competitions top end aluminum chainguides!

Affordable, reliable, lightweight chain retention has been born. The old adage “Cheap, light and strong – you can only pick two” has just been deleted.


SS+ Chain Retention System

•Uses World Cup winning SRS+ guide design
•Fixed position wear-plates for simple, no-hassle setup
•Includes impact-flexure design Turbocharger Bashguard patents pending
•32-36T chainring capacity
•High tensile chrome-moly steel backplate
•Anti-corrosion nickel-chrome plated
•New Tech 3 Stealth Idler
•258 grams light! Super strong and super light! And crazy awesome!
•$89.95 MSRP

Trust the Security of an e*thirteen, anything else is just a chainguide.

www.e13components.com
Share on Twitter, Facebook, Email

| More

Link to News Story


56 Comments

  • + 6
flag bikebuster (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:06)
looking gooooood
  • + 7
flag yellow-invasion (Oct 29, 2009 at 18:13)
looks like you can kill someone with that back plate
  • + 2
flag carsonprice (Oct 29, 2009 at 20:12)
forget the other models, this one takes the win
  • + 1
flag jasongreen (Oct 30, 2009 at 0:04)
FUNNY! I just made my own EXACTLY like this! My flatline came stock with the ECONO version of E-13's LG-1 with the steel backing plate and no TACO. I modified it to fit a bashring. Guess I was ahead of the curve!


http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/4218563/
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/4218566/
  • + 1
flag MatthewCarpenter (Oct 31, 2009 at 12:29)
"32-36T chainring capacity" Frown

Seems to be a nice chain retention system, but on a DH Bike you might wanna use a 38T or 40T chainring. It would be great to see an option for those customers.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag lifeis2ride (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:08)
looking veryyyy gooooood
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag brodieman96 (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:08)
cheep but sick one might be on my race bike next year....
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag radatabs (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:10)
im thinking thats going to be my new chain guide
[Reply]
  • + 14
flag benplatt (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:12)
Good idea to make cheap versions when everything is so expensive nowadays!
  • + 6
flag VTwintips (Oct 29, 2009 at 17:47)
ya finally a company is going more in the RIGHT direction. making it more compatible and for everyone... unlike fox!
  • + 1
flag marquis (Oct 29, 2009 at 19:55)
its not just fox though.

and looks nice but the cost difference has to be worth it.
  • + 1
flag JackBTON (Nov 2, 2009 at 10:30)
cost difference would be nice. shame its just a suggested price from e thirteen. all the shops i have found are selling it at £120Frown
  • + 1
flag philw86 (Nov 2, 2009 at 11:36)
The SRS+ is the guide that you are finding online. The SS+ backplate is still in production. It should be available very soon.
  • + 1
flag JackBTON (Nov 2, 2009 at 12:50)
ah ok thats cool then. hopefuly it will stay quite cheapBig Grin
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag GAZA101 (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:14)
i wantDrool
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hardtaildh08 (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:15)
isss nicee might buy one
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag cprice (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:40)
its looks pretty good to
[Reply]
  • - 7
flag HartofDarkness (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:45) (Below Threshold) show comment
AWESOME bashguard! The rest of the guide is utter crap though!
  • + 2
flag knobzy (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:47)
i am not a fan on the bash guard. i like the plain solid ones better.
  • + 5
flag kylemciver (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:49)
Its light, cheap and it works, what else could you want?
  • + 1
flag timex255 (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:42)
And strong. I shit bricks when i saw the price. 90$ is amazing for something of that quality.
[Reply]
  • + 11
flag ustemuf (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:49)
its 258g now.. 958g after all the mud & rocks get stuck and harden in the honeycomb bashguard design.
  • + 2
flag v1k1n9 (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:08)
you are right on that one
  • + 1
flag liveless (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:09)
Shhhh! Wink
  • + 2
flag zgr7 (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:23)
Exactly
  • + 6
flag curlxupxandxdle (Oct 29, 2009 at 18:03)
god forbid a couple extra hundred grams from mud stickin on it... end of the world
  • + 1
flag ustemuf (Oct 29, 2009 at 20:00)
it doesnt bother me at all.. but with all the weight weenies pinching over every gram... you would think it'd make more sense to make the bashguard more durable by having a solid flat surface that nothing can get stuck in.

yes it will add some more weight, but all that crap not gettin stuck in there would balance that out and still probably be less weight.
  • + 4
flag kylemciver (Oct 30, 2009 at 11:39)
Just remember to take a big dump in the morning before you head out riding.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag marco4848 (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:51)
nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brett878 (Oct 29, 2009 at 15:58)
does it comes in anyother colors
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag daugherd (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:13)
This is definitely on my list for my winter/spring DH build.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tonestar (Oct 29, 2009 at 16:33)
Doesn't stamped steel bend super easy, I know they have put ridges to stiffen it up, but still, it is no where near as durable as aluminum for this kind of application.
  • + 1
flag Mazekwon (Oct 29, 2009 at 17:03)
yeah i think it isn't really designed for super agressive riding, probably more like a taco guard with a tensioner, i wouldn't trust it on my demo, but maybe on my bigfoot. if that makes sense
  • + 3
flag bunkey (Oct 29, 2009 at 17:05)
Aluminium is brittle and will crack on hard direct impact, you will find Cro-Mo desperses the force better as it has the added flexibility (much like steel hardtails). Although yes, bending it out of shape is also something which might happen, but it depends on the thickness of the sheet steel as to how much force it would take. I'd say e13 have it worked out pretty well.
  • + 1
flag Mazekwon (Oct 29, 2009 at 17:12)
that makes sense, much like Cro-mo and Alu frames
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag sykesy (Oct 29, 2009 at 17:57)
tonestar- the backplate bending is a good thing, iscg mounts are well known for snapping and cracking under heavy impact. i'd much rather ruin a 45 quid backplate which dissipates force by bending, than snap the mounts off a 2000 quid frame
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag elkluvadore (Oct 29, 2009 at 19:40)
I have this in black brand new for 55$ plus shipping
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Schlessmonkey (Oct 29, 2009 at 20:10)
im gettin this fo sho
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Hombre3000 (Oct 29, 2009 at 22:09)
Way to go E.13!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jinx (Oct 29, 2009 at 23:11)
Lol it will weigh a f*cking ton once those crevices starts catching mud.
  • + 1
flag Gsnickets (Oct 30, 2009 at 0:02)
how many sloppy mud races did you run last year?
  • + 3
flag cyrix (Oct 30, 2009 at 1:53)
Well good thing we haven't invented things like hoses to spray out the mud and gunk...........Oh wait.
  • + 0
flag flymore (Oct 30, 2009 at 16:35)
lol
  • + 2
flag jinx (Nov 3, 2009 at 9:40)
In a rainy country like Sweden you'll encounter mud on almost every ride and the mud will add up unecessary weight. Better to use a solid peice instead.
  • + 0
flag cyrix (Nov 3, 2009 at 20:00)
I made a trip to portland and rode there. I kept a small brush on me for those long rides to get the mud out. The point being: If you know you're riding muddy terrain you'll come prepared (I know I do in PA for rainy days and riding) and if you're at a resort there's a hose somewhere near by. Collecting mud is a moot point against the product.
  • + 0
flag jinx (Nov 4, 2009 at 3:04)
Yes, but idea was to drop weight, right? And does it lower the weight during muddy riding? No. The bike's weight when you're not racing has no relevance, it's when you ride that the weight matters and if it rains it will result in a heavier bashguard.
  • + 1
flag Gsnickets (Nov 4, 2009 at 6:38)
oh my god, my bike is 5 grams heavier than when I started my run..... get a life man, you know you'd never be able to notice the few specks of mud in the bash guard. are you the same one to bitch that having a standard solid bash guard in the dry is too much extra weight? quit'yer bitchin'.
  • + 0
flag jinx (Nov 4, 2009 at 12:16)
I don't give a shizzle about the weight, my bike weighs a healthy 44lbs. Besides, you where the one to start b*tching about the weight. For someone who cares about the weight, that extra 100 grams of mud will count so a thinner/solid bash will be more effective.
  • + 0
flag cyrix (Nov 4, 2009 at 19:25)
If you don't care about your weight why do you care about mud getting in there when it can be easily rinsed out? You're bikes going to get muddy anyways with or without the ring.

Nice try at a cop out.
  • + 0
flag jinx (Nov 5, 2009 at 1:35)
You don't get it do you? I meant for those weight saving f*gs, the mud will have a big effect on the weight and this bash will most probably weigh more with mud than a soli one.
As I said, I don't care about my bikes weigh.
[Reply]
  • - 5
flag jasongreen (Oct 30, 2009 at 0:07) (Below Threshold) show comment
FUNNY! I just made my own EXACTLY like this! My flatline came stock with the ECONO version of E-13's LG-1 with the steel backing plate and no TACO. I modified it to fit a bashring. Guess I was ahead of the curve!

http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/4218563/
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/4218566/
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mumbuff (Oct 30, 2009 at 0:33)
I wish E-13 made more components because what they do produce is sick.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag badgermeister (Oct 30, 2009 at 6:18)
that awesome bashring coupled with a blackspire stinger is gonna be my super sweet DRS set up!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag b-wicked (Oct 30, 2009 at 7:48)
I don't care I have my "old" LG1 with taco and it works .....
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bigtard (Oct 31, 2009 at 15:27)
good to see they've gone the opposite direction of ridiculously light too. such as their new lg1 guide, which is nice and light. but they've proven to be too light for a whole season of regular smashing
hopefully they've used some more normal hardware too. not some ridiculously expensive to produce and irreplaceable tiny custom bits
still likely the best company to buy chain guides from
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag peterman1234 (Nov 1, 2009 at 16:10)
Go for the SRS+. loads nicer, retails $150 i believe
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link