Rocky Mountain Slope Bike - Sneak Peek

by Tyler Maine
Jul 14, 2010 at 14:45

Source: Dave Smutok

Dave just sent over a few pics of his ALL NEW Rocky Mountain Slope Style bike. This bike is never going to production and was made in Vancouver, B.C. for Gully, Smutok, and Jarrett to compete on, there will only be 10 made.

4 inches of slope slaying machine inside,




bigquotesThis thing is my dream slope bike, it feels like my hartail with 4 inches of travel.. - Dave Smutok

Must Read This Week

159 Comments

  • + 32
flag shreddadirt12 (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:46)
 damm sexy
  • + 8
flag dirtjumper679 (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:50)
 omg thats so sick
  • + 14
flag leon-forfar (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:52)
 its growing on me more and more, reminds me of a cross between a giant trance and the trek remedy ss
  • + 5
flag ritchierich (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:53)
 nothing unique, and whats with the choice of fork?!
  • + 11
flag tacobell123 (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:53)
 rocky mountain is stepping it up
  • + 6
flag idrinkpabst (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:01)
 Two words: Banshee Wildcard
  • + 2
flag tacobell123 (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:03)
 i think its like sorges trance
  • + 7
flag ecostigan (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:03)
 looks alot like semenuks old frame.
  • + 1
flag mtnbikes4life (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:04)
 sleek! Smile
  • + 8
flag runner (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:08)
 Very nice
No seatpost extension though, too bad.
  • + 2
flag xetal (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:20)
 Another copy of a copy ! Nothing new !
  • + 7
flag norcalassassin (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:30)
 definately not... completely different suspension design than other bikes
  • + 1
flag shredbag (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:35)
 thats the highland parking lot
  • + 22
flag pwngemn (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:39)
 i can probably think of like 15 other bikes that have this same suspension design, starting with walmart bikes...
  • + 2
flag mr-eric (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:42)
 looks a hell of a lot like this http://www.covebike.com/bikes/hooker/hooker.jpg
  • - 1
flag pwngemn (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:58)
 that's a sick bike anyhow!
  • + 0
flag norcalassassin (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:01)
 look at the pivot by the dropout....
  • + 2
flag theg-man (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:30)
 "hartail" Razz
  • + 4
flag rmesfcmdr9er (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:49)
 i fail to see the resemblance from this bike and the hooker both bikes have completly different angles and you can bet on the geometry being way different
  • + 2
flag smike (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:12)
 @pwngemn: do you think the Walmart bikes had this suspension bikes first, and all the bike manufacturers are copying them? Or perhaps it might be the other way around?
  • + 1
flag pwngemn (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:26)
 no, my comment was replying to noralassassin who thinks that this is such an original design. I am not saying that they had the design first...
  • + 0
flag norcalassassin (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:36)
 ya someone may have had it first but it is different pivot placement
  • + 3
flag sheffy7 (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:39)
 it is so tiny looking.
  • + 16
flag shredbag (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:58)
 ^^^thats what she said^^^
  • + 2
flag btjader (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:17)
 ritchierich, a two-step lyrik set at 115? ain't such a terrible fork
  • + 1
flag Waldon83 (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:58)
 Only 10 made! Lucky I don't want one
  • + 3
flag jdavidson (Jul 14, 2010 at 23:40)
 why would they only make ten?
every other year they've made a ss slayer
  • + 1
flag freerider95 (Jul 15, 2010 at 3:58)
 haha i think i saw him get the package for this at highland the other day
  • + 10
flag cyberhawk Plus (Jul 15, 2010 at 4:53)
 i'll stick with my cowan DS Big Grin
  • + 3
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 15, 2010 at 5:19)
 You guys are clowns. This bike, aside from having slopestyle type geometry, which I think you will find is roughly the same across the board, looks more like the new Rocky Slayer than anything else. Same dropout design, same pivot points, similar tubing. So if the ripped off anybody, its themselves.
  • + 3
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 15, 2010 at 5:19)
 And what do you all care anyways..........keep your bikes, this one's for not for sale.
  • + 4
flag jv86416 Plus (Jul 15, 2010 at 7:29)
 Does rocky mountain want a medal or somthing for coming out with this? Like why make such a bike deal of it if they are only making ten. Its like they're just showing us that " even though this bike won't be produced, we are still capable of producing a slope bike like all the other cool companies"
  • + 1
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 15, 2010 at 7:38)
 Thats not their intention at all. They are just showing it off, its a cool bike. You would too.
  • + 1
flag joeljsh (Jul 15, 2010 at 9:53)
 that sucks that their only making 10 of them
  • + 2
flag pimpmytrail (Jul 15, 2010 at 11:11)
 why is there going to be only 10 made! nooo i want one
  • + 1
flag tstep3 (Jul 16, 2010 at 0:26)
 it looks more like a tiny version of a 2010 glory without the maelstro system
  • + 1
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 16, 2010 at 4:59)
 Yes, they all look like full-suspension 26 inch BMX bikes, to be honest. Its because thats what works. Thats what slopestyle is, its BMX free-style on a larger scale.
  • + 3
flag jv86416 Plus (Jul 16, 2010 at 5:37)
 Darkstar is mr know it all
  • + 5
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 16, 2010 at 5:56)
 I could change my name to mrknowitall, but i prefer my current sn. No, seriously I wasnt trying to come off that way- I just think that the reason all slopestyle bikes look the same is the same reason all bmx-bikes look the same. There are charecteristics that desired that dictate how the bike looks. Low top tube, strong tuebset, low travel.....ect ect. Its the same reason all moto-cross bikes look the same, you gotta go with what works. Not trying to be a dick, just discussing here.
  • + 2
flag cyberhawk Plus (Jul 16, 2010 at 6:05)
 thanks for neg propping me choosing to run one of the few konas that dont break and have a good history.. Razz

im giving darkstar a +1 for the only one making SENSE in this discussion Salute
  • + 1
flag forzee (Jul 16, 2010 at 19:48)
 not single speedFrown
  • + 2
flag RaleighVoid (Jul 21, 2010 at 8:19)
 wellll you cant really, you'd have to put loads of slack in the chain for single speed and use a long cage derailier or something. or a pauls tensioner

ie, get a bass.
  • + 2
flag cyberhawk Plus (Jul 21, 2010 at 8:44)
 tha bass is the new cowan Big Grin
  • + 2
flag RaleighVoid (Jul 21, 2010 at 8:56)
 ino, ive got one and you know it Wink
  • + 1
flag cyberhawk Plus (Jul 22, 2010 at 0:40)
 tup
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag RMB-PM (Jul 14, 2010 at 18:40)
 Ok guys, here it is... This is #2 of 10 to be made. Evarrr. If you want one, really want one one day, you need to make it known. The way I see it right now, there is just no way to build this thing at a reasonable cost:

The bike you see has CNC'ed everything, and that costs $$$$. We will build enough Slayers to justify the cost of opening forged tooling, which keeps the price in check. But the ONLY way this bike will ever go to production is if there is enough demand (and sales) to justify it. The world doesn't need a $4000 SS bike.

So talk to your shop. Show them you are serious. Write your congressman. Start a petition. Whatever. Start a thread with a headcount.
  • + 2
flag BRRider (Jul 14, 2010 at 19:24)
 Not that i'd ever want a 4" jump fully that i can't run singlespeed without a tensioner, but i'm wondering why a company would choose not to make a bike available to the public because of the cost of CNC'ing everything. Just don't CNC everything... it likely saved a 1/4 of a pound in the end. I highly doubt your gonna be seeing anyone crying over a shock mount that hasn't been machined out. I definitely can't see a demand for this bike if it will cost as much as you say, i can't see much of a demand for this bike at all actually... kinda seems like it's been beat to punch by alot of other companies and their single speed ready designs and other companies that don't use single speed designs as well. It does look pretty though, maybe that will go together well with this hype on the front page of pinkbike for some positive results in terms of demand. It does look like a fun ride i just can't see any reasons anyone would consider this bike over other options out there, the "it feels like my hardtail with 4 inches of travel" line is classic and has been said about pretty much every other 4 inch dirt jump fully. Good luck selling this "slopestyle" bike to kids with too much money who need the $4000 dollar CNC'd everything dirt jump bike to help them on there way to becoming the uber hero bike pro.
  • + 4
flag kevinthelilbiker (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:24)
 IF you read what he said, the only way it goes into production is if you can justify the cost of forged tooling...

Forged stuff is lighter and cheeper to make... but the setup and getting the tooling is REALLY expensive. Thus they need to know they can sell enough to make it worth it. Otherwise for small production runs CNC is actually cheaper.

Obviously you going off about how people wont pay 4000$ for this bike is dumb when its a reply to him saying the bike wont be marketed for sale because its cost is too high.
  • + 1
flag BRRider (Jul 15, 2010 at 5:56)
 yeah my point for posting was that whatever the cost of the frame, it's silly to act like your withholding your amazing cnc'd or open forged everything bike, when so many other companies are currently succesfully selling more effective rigs. I don't know why someone would even consider this bike with so many other better options especially after a representative from the company mentioned a $4000 dollar price tag in whatever context he meant it in. Just seems like silly hype.
  • + 1
flag leon-forfar (Aug 15, 2010 at 0:44)
 just to let u guys know.. i taled to a rocky guy at the booth at crankworx, they said there is no way they would sell it for 3500, they are looking at around 2000ish for frame
[Reply]
  • + 7
flag silverstonemedia Plus (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:01)
 when is this thing going to be avaliable?
  • + 3
flag Bmx259 (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:38)
 its not going into production Frown
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag hampsteadbandit (Jul 15, 2010 at 4:49)
 Two words: Banshee Wildcard

different suspension system

the Rocky-Mtn has "four-bar" (chain stay pivot i.e. horst pivot)

the Wildcard has "faux-bar" (seat stay pivot)

this Rocky SS is the first I've seen from the Rocky brand using a chain stay pivot (i.e. FSR), their previous bikes have been "faux-bar" so they can sell into the USA

because its not going into production there is no chance of Specialized taking them to court over selling a production bike with a "horst pivot"

overall, looks like a sweet frame
  • + 3
flag smike (Jul 15, 2010 at 6:30)
 Not entirely true... The new slayer uses the same suspension but still doesn't require licencing from specialized because it's still not a true FSR design. The horst link specifically has the rear pivot below and forward of the rear axle. This does not, so they can get away with it.
  • + 1
flag peteypete (Jul 15, 2010 at 11:25)
 Have you not seen the Rocky Mountain Altitude or the new Element RSL? Those bikes and the new Slayer all use RMB's patented pivot location that is NOT an FSR. Rocky's patent owns above the axle and Specialized owns below the axle. Simple.
  • + 1
flag nesquick (Jul 16, 2010 at 7:59)
 in adition...wildcard (and even rampant) has to long chainstay,
[Reply]
  • + 7
flag rigodon777 (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:13)
 FINALLY a SS bike I can buy from my shop. Smile And it looks sick.
  • + 5
flag rzappy (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:04)
 it isnt going into production. i dont know why rocky mountain would choose to do that but they are only making ten.
  • + 2
flag rigodon777 (Jul 15, 2010 at 8:09)
 Even if it isn't i'm sure I can work out something with the rep. haha!
  • + 2
flag R1OT (Jul 15, 2010 at 16:37)
 Yeah goodluck with that buddy. Imagine the retail on one of these...
  • + 2
flag KyleIsaman (Jul 15, 2010 at 17:15)
 congrats, rigodon.. you know a rep! that gives you absolutely zero pull with rocky mountain on getting your grimy little paws on one of these.
  • + 2
flag nfiorito (Jul 19, 2010 at 9:45)
 they'll make them in like 2012, you all know that right? your comments are just a test to check interest.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag dsheffer (Jul 15, 2010 at 20:52)
 They need to release this bike. The slayer SS is a terrible bike for slopestyle why do you think they made this. Cause their riders hated the slayer. not saying its a bad bike im sure its good for trails and other stuff but for slopestyle its simply to big with terrible stand over. And not a very flickable bike for tailwhips and spins watching gully on the slayer in crankworks it looked like all of his tricks took so much more effort because of how big and burly slayers are. Rocky should keep the slayer as a trail bike and release this as there slopestyle/4xbike there one of the only companies left that doesnt have a legit 4inch bike.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag n3lson666x (Jul 15, 2010 at 10:37)
 why is evrone ragging it alredi?
its a nice looking bike theres nothing wrong with the sus setup, not evry bike needs a brand new suspennsion redesign to be good

and wtf is with all the "its nothing new" "it looks like a...."
it could have a totaly diferant geo to any ss bike made today, none of you know yet you still choose to be ignorant and put unescacery comments

imo it looks sick
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag HutchiDMR (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:49)
 daddy i know what i want for Christmas
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag JBizzle (Jul 15, 2010 at 2:08)
 to all the 14 year olds that say oh look its the same suspension design as a TREK c'mon, are you joking. First off the pivot is no where near the same spot, it's not nearly as active under braking as the TREK. Yes it shares some similar looks, sloping downtube, linkage looks similar, but it's not, so please enroll yourselves in some common sense courses, so that everyone else who has any basic knowledge of suspension designs


and to Rocky Mountain, the bike looks great, and has some awesome angles.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag EthanKnott (Jul 15, 2010 at 10:25)
 this bike is like every other "slope" bike out there. but every company wants one and the design seems to work for most people, so why not use it? the claim that "it feels like my hard tail" is definatly nothing new, everyone says that! but obviously he likes his new ride so stop hatin!!
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag wildkard726 (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:13)
 HOW DO THEY GET THE BIKE TO STAND ON ITS OWN???! every picture I see, its just standing thereRazz
  • + 6
flag Steezysix (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:44)
 They balance it upright and then run backwards and take a perfectly focused picture before it falls over. Or magic.
  • + 7
flag Budi-san (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:46)
 Its magic. It has to be.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Deeeznuts (Jul 14, 2010 at 19:01)
 I like the look and it seems to be popular already but RMB-PM, what exactly is it that makes this bike so outrageously exspencive. granted it has the fancy hydroformed tubing and does have it's fair share of cnc but it seems other companies are able to do the samething profitably. why do you guys think that this will not profit?
  • + 3
flag peteypete (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:39)
 Profitably? Don't assume too much. Not many companies offer a dedicated slope bike and those that do, don't sell very many. It also isn't fair to compare the Slayer against brands that are more price point focused (I refuse to call them out specifically). The truth is that 90% of riders in this segment ride hardtails and don't want to buck up 3k for a slope bike.
  • + 1
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 15, 2010 at 5:33)
 Spot-on response pete.
  • + 1
flag mumbuff (Jul 15, 2010 at 13:05)
 Although hardtail bikes are a bigger market, short travel full sus' are the future. I think that if Rocky Mountain are going to survive in the future they need to listen to the demand and start making a bike for every occation.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hampsteadbandit (Jul 15, 2010 at 13:37)
 Not entirely true... The new slayer uses the same suspension but still doesn't require licencing from specialized because it's still not a true FSR design. The horst link specifically has the rear pivot below and forward of the rear axle. This does not, so they can get away with it.

Have you not seen the Rocky Mountain Altitude or the new Element RSL? Those bikes and the new Slayer all use RMB's patented pivot location that is NOT an FSR. Rocky's patent owns above the axle and Specialized owns below the axle. Simple.

if its that simple, why has Rocky Mtn. not used this system on their XC bikes before? why have their previous bikes used a faux-bar (seat stay pivot) system?

and do they actually own a specific "patent" on this 'above the axle' pivot location?

because there are a host of other companies in the US, Canada and Europe running horst-pivot style (chainstay pivots both under the axle, in-line with axle and above the rear wheel axle) on their bikes, and these are not patented....
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dsheffer (Jul 19, 2010 at 13:56)
 barnz0rz (1 days ago)
email norco and ask them how many empires they sold and see then if having a production slope bike is a worth while investment

LOL obviously it sells decent or they wouldnt have made another year of it for 2010 .Alot of 4-5inch 4x bikes sell well for example; transition double's, banshee rampants, kona bass's just to name a few, its a good investment for bike companies.
  • + 1
flag barnz0rz (Jul 23, 2010 at 21:43)
 check 2011.... no empire....

people will buy doubles and rampants because you expect that kind of custom bike from companies like that....
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dbxrace (Jul 15, 2010 at 7:55)
 not putting these into production is possibly one of the stupiest desicions buisness wise ive seen anyone make in a long time, why? it looks good and is the kind of bike a lot of people want at the moment.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag sammorris (Jul 15, 2010 at 15:27)
 whats the point in doing all the R&D and paying some one a good wage to design a bike thats not going into production? waste man
  • + 1
flag mvonhollen (Jul 15, 2010 at 17:25)
 Read some of the previous comments its not that hard to figure out!
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag dsheffer (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:38)
 man rocky fails hard if they dont put this bike into production it looks pretty dialed. I think it would sell well. Seems to me rocky has been slipping the last few years less and less sales they arnt as popular ever since the RMX was discontinued.
  • + 0
flag barnz0rz (Jul 18, 2010 at 11:30)
 email norco and ask them how many empires they sold and see then if having a production slope bike is a worth while investment
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Terrafire (Jul 15, 2010 at 1:03)
 How is that worth the money they put into designing the frame to only make 10?
  • + 2
flag lux-freerider (Jul 15, 2010 at 3:17)
 well it could be more like a publicity stunt, if people see their pro riders are doing good on this one they might take a closer look at Rocky for their next bike
  • + 3
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 15, 2010 at 5:57)
 Correct, same reason car companies build race cars. Cant we all just enjoy looking at this thing, which is sooooo beautifully made, instead of arguing over what design it looks like. Good greif Im sick of that. Their BICYCLES people, some of them are bound to be similar, you sound like a bunch of idiots going back and forth everyday about this. Everything posted on Pinkbike turns into this same argument, has anyone noticed that?
  • + 2
flag Terrafire (Jul 15, 2010 at 11:12)
 Yeah, but race cars arent affordable for the average person, If rocky put out this frame I would be able to buy it. Racecar, not so much.
  • + 1
flag DARKSTAR63 (Jul 16, 2010 at 4:32)
 Yeah, of course thats just a comparison, considering you could build the best bike in the world for under 10,000. While a top class race car can cost millions. Its just an example, the intention is the same.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag biker2stud (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:26)
 I'll test one of those out for you guys if you want to make sure they work
  • + 3
flag nsbiker95 (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:39)
 Then say it got stolen and keep iT
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag N4x4 (Jul 14, 2010 at 21:24)
 only 10 being made... huh... might have to fight for one haha
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag bikewashington94 (Jul 14, 2010 at 19:32)
 This makes me want to get a job!
  • + 5
flag Kona-Koffee (Jul 14, 2010 at 23:25)
 My god, that is the most american thing I've heard all day...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag peteypete (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:09)
 For the record, this bike will NEVER go to production. These frames are custom made in Vancouver for Gully, Smutok, and Jarrett Moore to compete on. Only 10 will be made.
  • + 1
flag cjwanner Plus (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:25)
 PC? is that you buddy?
  • + 1
flag universe (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:02)
 PC is no longer with Rocky.
  • + 1
flag cjwanner Plus (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:38)
 Oh seriously? Are you from Blacks in Courteny?
  • + 0
flag brule Mod Plus (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:56)
 This is correct and we've just added that to the main page part - only 10 made and it won't be a production model.
  • + 1
flag cjwanner Plus (Jul 15, 2010 at 8:36)
 Thanks Brule!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag itsnotgaylfltsabrojob (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:22)
 Looks like a traditional 4-bar to me... a.k.a. not a remedy
  • + 3
flag smike (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:13)
 Slightly different than a true horst-link though, as the pivot is above the axle. But you are correct that it is different than the remedy.
  • + 0
flag kevinthelilbiker (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:18)
 All I wanna know is if these modified horst-links (wich is really what they are) have been ruled a significant enough design change to get around paying royalties on the horst-link patent... or maybe the patents run up and they just wanna tag their suspension as unique regardless of it being practically the same.
  • + 2
flag smike (Jul 14, 2010 at 20:51)
 I believe that the Horst Link specifically has the pivot below the axle, which is how they get away with not having it licensed. From what I have read, it is this placement of the pivot that gives the Horst Link the benefits that it has. Putting the pivot above the axle, as RM has done, WILL change the way it performs - how, I'm not sure.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag slamminher (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:13)
 WoW it look's like a trek.It's most likely rad but it looks like all the other's out there.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag fantaman (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:53)
 That thing is sex on two wheelsDrool,awesome job Rocky Mountain
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Lone-Wolf-Productions (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:55)
 Sure looks like a Banshee Wildcard
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag skinnerstp09 (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:19)
 if only it was bb pivot
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Kondasaurus (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:27)
 hot bike, i believe Jarret Moore is getting this soon
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nesquick (Jul 16, 2010 at 7:14)
 I want one, why just this bike never going to production. It seems geometry atc.... is perfect..head angle....chainstay
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag SpeshAllDay (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:04)
 Well slap me silly and ... oh, well don't do that. So does this mean a new light fr bike from rocky?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mysticar (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:56)
 what a bike!frame looks clean. any informations about geometry and weight?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag seb-c (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:58)
 Any one know when the price will be reviled? i hope its not too much pretty dam nice Smile
  • + 2
flag Deeds (Jul 15, 2010 at 7:16)
 read the first paragraph
it says its not going into production
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag laurencethorpe (Jul 15, 2010 at 14:43)
 snata i really want one for christmas
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag chazza (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:53)
 yes please!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Slopestyle669 (Aug 12, 2010 at 15:54)
 to bad there not for sale to the public!!! give props if you agree!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag shredde (Jul 15, 2010 at 11:55)
 have a;ways wanted a slayer! soo strong nd perect for slopestyle but would rather the slayer ss becouse its a bit bigger
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag loaded (Jul 15, 2010 at 7:41)
 I will buy one of these right now!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag trekiscool (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:11)
 oh mannnn thats sick it looks like the remedy ss
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag aabider (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:55)
 Holy Shet
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag reecewallace Plus (Jul 14, 2010 at 19:12)
 So sick! I want one haha. Looks really short.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag MarzRider (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:34)
 ohh Im gonna get one of these.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Lucky7Man Plus (Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02)
 man thats a nice bike and now rocky mountain has a gnar ss bike
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Jobobasaurus (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:09)
 that bike looks really damn fun!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Budi-san (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:48)
 Well, nothing too new. Rocky Mountain's jumping into the short-travel/SS fray.

But gotta admit, it looks pretty clean.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag BallerBoy33 (Jul 16, 2010 at 18:12)
 whats the componenant list?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bigbluebike (Jul 15, 2010 at 14:49)
 OMFG. I may have just found my dream bike.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag caiocrz (Jul 16, 2010 at 12:28)
 I would wet my self if i sit on this bike
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Callum2290 (Jul 16, 2010 at 8:14)
 sick bike but personaly i would not use a lyric for slope style:/
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Doaner09 (Jul 19, 2010 at 23:08)
 omg! f*ckin sexy!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag laurencethorpe (Jul 15, 2010 at 14:43)
 santa
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag biking-all-day (Jul 16, 2010 at 16:30)
 NICE
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag primodeelux (Jul 15, 2010 at 18:46)
 that's one sweet KonaSmile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Scottyteam1 (Jul 15, 2010 at 13:50)
 I WANT YOU!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Conor71 (Jul 17, 2010 at 14:37)
 sex
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag MTBlegree (Jul 14, 2010 at 19:03)
 super wicked
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Dymented-Delirium (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:18)
 Dope
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Steezysix (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:46)
 Really nice, it'd be nice to compare it to a Transition Double.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag masonkona (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:12)
 that is sooooo nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dirtmonkey1 (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:50)
 sweeet
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag blackpegasus (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:49)
 very nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag leongrom (Jul 15, 2010 at 8:36)
 nice,sick,tchill,shit
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag metalmike (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:13)
 beautiful bike
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Roobertt (Jul 15, 2010 at 0:25)
 almost like trek
  • + 1
flag nesquick (Jul 16, 2010 at 7:45)
 he he, a jak by to mělo vypadat...jako olpran? author? vypadá to takhle, pže většina kol je dělaná tak aby se l'bily a fungovaly.....a hlavně byly co nejjednodušš' - teď prostě frč' tohle :-) řekl bych
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Monsterincx (Jul 15, 2010 at 2:12)
 i want.....now
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Sound (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:51)
 i want!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag landgreen (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:07)
 what rear rim is that??
  • + 1
flag leon-forfar (Jul 15, 2010 at 1:13)
 fsa gravity light on the front and a gravity on the back i believe
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag natewynanscreations (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:23)
 LEGIT!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag lucacometti (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:48)
 nice looks good
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag PhoS (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:47)
 looks short as hell
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag cammccaulismyhero (Jul 14, 2010 at 17:14)
 sick! whats the msrp?
  • + 3
flag CD01 (Jul 14, 2010 at 22:13)
 On a bike you can't buy, pick any price cuz it wont matter....
  • + 1
flag cammccaulismyhero (Jul 16, 2010 at 17:47)
 they arnt gonna release for 2011??
  • + 1
flag brundle (Jul 19, 2010 at 21:19)
 they cost to much to make they said it was like 4-5000 for the bike
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag ctownbike (Jul 14, 2010 at 14:47)
 oh baby
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag trevorsiebert (Jul 14, 2010 at 15:12)
 they like copied the trek remedy
  • + 3
flag trekiscool (Jul 14, 2010 at 16:00)
 yeaaah but can u blame them? haha
[Reply]
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.093452